MikroTik Routerboard
Authorized Distributor & Reseller


RB435G


Five miniPCI slots and three Gigabit Ethernet ports give you enough connectivity options to use the RB435G as the central part of your network. Now with Gigabit ports, to properly utilize all the speed 802.11n with Nv2 wireless.

Five miniPCI slots to be used for four sectors and a backbone, or any other configuration you need- RB435G has largest number of miniPCI slots from all our products. If you need to utilize many miniPCI cards - RB435G is your choice!

The two USB 2.0 ports can be used for extending storage, adding a 3G wireless modem for backup connectivity,for a mobile installation or all together.

Product specifications

Details
Product code RB435G
CPU nominal frequency 680 MHz
CPU core count 1
Size of RAM 256 MB
Architecture MIPS-BE
10/100 Ethernet ports 0
10/100/1000 Ethernet ports 3
MiniPCI slots 5
MiniPCI-e slots 0
Wireless chip model None
Number of USB ports 2
Memory Cards 1
Memory card type microSD
Power Jack 8-30V DC
802.3af support No
PoE 8-28V DC on Ether1
Voltage Monitor Yes
PCB temperature monitor Yes
CPU temperature monitor No
Dimensions 105mm x 154mm
Operating System RouterOS
Operating temperature range -30C to +60C
License level L5
Current Monitor Yes
CPU AR7161-BC1A
SFP ports 0
USB slot type USB type A

Performance test results

RB435G (680Mhz) Gigabit port test RouterOS
Mode Configuration 64 byte 512 byte 1518 byte
kpps Mbps kpps Mbps kpps Mbps
Bridging none 187.3 122.9 171.9 728.9 58.0 712.7
Bridging 25 bridge filter rules 86.4 56.7 84.5 358.3 58.5 718.8
Routing none 147.0 96.4 136.1 577.1 59.7 733.6
Routing 25 simple queues 137.0 89.9 117.7 499.0 55.2 678.3
Routing 25 ip filter rules 59.2 38.8 59.4 251.9 54.7 672.2
  1. All tests are done with Xena Networks specialized test equipment (XenaBay),and done according to RFC2544 (Xena2544)
  2. Max throughput is determined with 30+ second attempts with 0,1% packet loss tolerance in 64, 512, 1518 byte packet sizes
  3. Values in Italic indicate that max throughput was reached without maxing out CPU, but because board interface configuration was maxed out
  4. Test results show device maximum performance, and are reached using mentioned hardware and software configuration, different configurations most likely will result in lower results